Submit a well-formatted pull request with a 500+ word peer review of your partner’s
drawing app. Your partner will be the same one as in the clinic, which will help you evaluate a little of the app’s evolution. Here they are for reference:
EDIT: tsukori, wfh1972, camazotz, and gao14g have been reassigned for the peer review. Everyone else stays the same.
jamesma560 : JayYang95
wagerpascal : hannahlwang
EternalFootman : nataliele
ShyArmadillo8 : clairewlj
izayak : namagic
yiyangshi : touchwick
batlopez : jwarrich
ericabrody : payalpn
tsukori : gao14g
wookiemage : RhymesWithMecca
camazotz : wfh1972
Your peer review/reflection should contain the following sections:
The app
The assignment stated that the app should:
- Have an entirely graphical user interface (i.e. no printed text input besides what turtle.write())
- Allow the user to select a drawing mode that changes the program’s repsonse to clicks and/or keys
- Display the current mode and other relevant information to the user
- Allow the user to choose and draw shapes, lines, and colors depending upon the selected mode
- Allow the user to clear the drawing and start over
Did it? What strikes you about your partner’s app, its functionality, and its interface?
The code
The assignment stated that the code should:
- Utilize custom modules for readability and organization
- Utilize custom functions for modularity
- Utilize definite loops (i.e.
for
loops) - Utilize multiple Turtle objects
- Utilize a named Screen object
- Run without errors
- Be well-commented
- Be well-organized and readable
Did it? How did your partner’s code contribute to the app’s functionality and interface?
The process
Looking over your partner’s reflection, initial milestones and final milestones, how did they approach this project? Did they adapt their process in response to challenges? Were their milestones clearly stated, acheiveable, and collectively sufficient to satisfy the project requirements?
Self-reflection
How did your partner’s app, code and process differ from yours? What can you learn from them? What did you like about what they did? What did you dislike? Looking back on your work, how would you evaluate yourself?